I'm David Hart, Co-Founder and COO of ScreenCloud and other tech businesses, AMA!

We founded ScreenCloud https://screen.cloud/ in 2015. ScreenCloud is a SaaS platform that helps organizations align their workplaces and communicate important information using screens. We have over 9,000 customers and about 90 people. Prior to this I co-founded an agency and several other SaaS projects as well as a couple of mobile apps businesses, The areas I love talking about are:

  1. Moving from consultancy to a product company - how a side product becomes the main product.
  2. SaaS metrics: what’s important and when
  3. Navigating early-stage funding
  4. How we have used content to help us drive a regular inbound pipeline
  5. The future of work, specifically with regards to connected workplaces. In a world where working practices are becoming increasingly flexible and distributed, how will we collaborate and communicate effectively? (hint: we think screens play a big part!)

I’ll be here 12th March 9:30 PT / 17:30 GMT


Note: This AMA is closed for new questions, but you can check out the existing conversations below.

In this AMA, we had David Hart — the co-founder and COO of ScreenCloud, a serial entrepreneur, a former agency “mad man”, and a passionate runner — share his thoughtful insights on building strong co-founder relationships, successfully switching from service to SaaS model, and all the SaaS metrics you should be inevitably watching early on. Dive in!

AMA Index (David’s brain-pickings) :brain:

(founding insights, opinions, and observations; deftly examined and articulated)

The journey past $1m: “It’s somehow better, but not easier”
David distils 16 years of co-founding lessons
Metrics worth observing between the $100k-$1m course, the long-haul of content, and why churn never really disappears
David’s counsel on the agency-product transition ( and commitment)
How not to get sidetracked during the early days of the product path
Thoughts on the “million dollar questions” of customer acquisition and fundraising
“Do the things that keep you sane and happy, and don’t feel guilty that, for example, going to the gym in the afternoon is what you need to do to get the best out of your day”
Why the ScreenCloud team firmly sided with selling the agency and a brief breakdown of how they dealt with their existing clients during the shift
Why David believes that reseller partnerships rarely pan out in the early days
How the ScreenCloud co-founders aligned their work

Further reading/listening/pondering from the interwebz :open_book:/:headphones:

(Other insightful excerpts drawn from blog posts, interviews, and conversations)

On going from $0-$1M:

"Sadly, once you get to $1m, it doesn’t get any easier: the stakes are higher and the decisions you take can make a bigger impact; the problems are more complex; your team will be bigger; your competition will start to look like a threat; your product roadmap will be longer; and the responsibilities you have to your staff, customers and investors can feel overwhelming at times. But I still maintain that the journey from $0 to $1m in ARR has its unique brand of toughness. You have to summon up every advantage you have whatever that may be: luck, skills, contacts, experience, access to money or just dogged perseverance.”
Source: 8 things that will definitely happen as you scale your SaaS business from $0-$1m

On transitioning from an agency model to SaaS:

“It’s been a journey that I wouldn’t want to really repeat. Lots of sleepless nights and uncertainty along the way. At times it felt like we were so exposed and the individual moving parts were so fragile and tenuous, that if the wheels fell off any one thing, we could face some difficult decisions. But although the plan flexed and bent a bit along the way, we always had the end goal. And we had each other.”
Source: How we transitioned from a digital agency to a product company.

On founder alignment:

“And, although sharing the same values is really important, that doesn’t mean you always agree. Great design might be something that everyone believes is important, but the decision to rebrand might generate differing opinions amongst Founders. The key difference is that Founders know that the disagreement is about the route, rather than the destination. In other words, if you know that your co-founder only wants the same outcome as you, you should never feel offended if they say that they disagree with your opinion.”
Source: Founder alignment: more crucial than you think.

Stay in touch: :sunny:

You can follow David to stay updated with his discoveries and insights:

  1. David on Twitter
  2. David on LinkedIn

Hello David,

It is nice to have you here! Welcome.

I can relate to it when you say the journey after $1M doesn’t get easier. :slightly_smiling_face: What advice would you have for others on what to look for during these times, the things one should channel all their focus on? While this will vary for different businesses — some kind of direction would be of great help.



Hi David! Thanks so much for offering to do an AMA on here!

So impressed with the growth of ScreenCloud – it’s phenomenal to see.

From what I understand, you’ve been with your co-founders for many many years – what are your top tips for building strong co-founder relationships that survive the test of time?


Hi David,

Thanks for your time in this AMA! We are looking to scale from $100k ARR to $1mm ARR and had a few questions:

  1. What SaaS metrics do you focus on in this stage?
  2. Our main channel is organic inbound – what kind of content strategy did you have in these early days that helped you achieve sustainable growth? How long did that take?
  3. What kind of churn did you face in this stage, and how did you handle that?

I’ll also be reading out your “8 things to scale $0-$1m” Medium article to get more insights :slight_smile:


Hey David,

Thank you for doing this AMA.

Your journey of transitioning from a digital agency to a product company is a dream for thousands of entrepreneurs around the world. What looks like a safe option (JV, let us build it as a side project) are the traps that you have discussed in detail in the blog. It’s fantastic.

How long of a runway should one plan for (considering the relative safety of existing revenue and let go of the golden handcuff)?

How do you think about transition of employees who are part of the agency business and think about DNA required to help you be more successful in a product business? Are there any pointers for salary and other incentives that are different based on your learnings of running both types of businesses?



Hi David,

Thank you so much for doing this AMA with us. Your articles were wonderful and made me realize that writing about the journey as is important as the journey itself. Will aim to put that into action :slight_smile:

We run a document collaboration platform called kriyadocs focused on the publishing domain. Much like yourself, we started off as a services business and have transformed ourselves into a product business. However, all of our customers from the services side have become enterprise customers on the SaaS side. Ideally, we would have liked to have started off clean but these customers were also our early adopters and supported us as we built the product. Therefore they are here to stay :slight_smile:

We are now looking to grow our platform with fully self-serve customers. I have the following questions

  1. What changes in the company’s mindset is necessary to make sure that product path is successful?
  2. How would you slowly wean off your enterprise customers from a high degree of services engagement?
  3. How do you get your product team to realize that small gaps in the product which have so far been papered over by services have to be addressed asap to enable us to grow?

I look forward to your responses.


Hey David

Thanks for doing this AMA.

We are building SigNoz - a tool which helps engineering teams to respond to issues before their customers find it , and thus help businesses get more efficient. Rather than getting calls from customers about issues in your software and getting engineering teams to respond to it - we generate alerts by monitoring the systems continuously and help communicate issues and responses across product, business and customer support team. We are early stage with few trials going on with customers in India (we are based out of Bangalore, India). I have the following questions for you:

  1. How do I reach out to customers in US & Europe? What channels are effective for reaching out to VP Engineering/ Product Manager persona? Ours is a global product and I want to gauge the response on our product from US/EU market fast - and not just be stuck in the local minima based on feedback from local market
  2. How does one think about funding the business? When is a good time to start looking for external funding for a product like ours? (For context, We are completely product focused currently - and have not raised any external money. But this slows down our speed - as we are just founders and few interns in the team currently. We have so many ideas to try in the product and for distribution)



I am Bojarajan here, founder of www.boombirds.com, a B2B SaaS targeting SME to digitally transform their service delivery operations back office or on-field.

We are at the early stages of revenue and are currently bootstrapped.

At this early stage, we don’t have budgets for paid marketing and hence we are trying partnership channels to help us with the initial traction.

Is this channel worth investing our time and energy to nurture for bringing in sales qualified leads from your experience?

What is the best model for partnership reimbursement from your experience? A bounty or a recurring commission? if so, is there a thumb rule from your play book that we could use as a benchmark?

Looking forward for your response.

Thanks and Regards,


Hello David,

Your article about founder alignment was an interesting read. Your observation that alignment at the value level is what makes founders stick together is great.

When it comes to founders working together in the long run, do you have any thoughts or advice on how to structure roles and work among themselves to put the org ahead of them?

Thanks. Looking forward to your responses!


OK - I’m off! HI Rajaraman - we’ve both been there, right? It’s somehow better, but not easier.

In my experience, there wasn’t one thing, it was often a case of keeping lots of plates spinning. Clearly one of the big challenges early on is making sure you have enough money to get to the next stage. It always takes longer and costs more than you think. Running out of money (and we did that, twice) is hard and hugely distracting.

But money aside, our main mission was simply to find product market fit as soon as possible and then prove that by having paying customers. Prior to that, all your conversations with investors and even staff, are a little bit hypothetical, but once you have some real customers willing to give you money (Jason Lemkin says at least 10), then you start having some data that backs up your hypothesis.

So, I would say, certainly in the early days, if you can manage your cash and focus on proving product market fit then you’re in a much stronger position.


Hey David,

Thanks for doing this AMA.

I can relate to your detailed blog post on transitioning from an agency to a product company — I have been trying to do the same and been fairly successful in cutting down on taking up new work. However, I’m yet to make the complete transition. In this context, I have two questions:

  1. If you had not sold the agency business, do you see yourself running it on the side perpetually by finding someone to lead it full-time?

  2. How did you manage to say goodbye to your agency customers? In particular, the customers who had stayed with you for a long time (2+ years).




Thanks James - that’s very kind of you.

Great question! Yes, me, Mark and Luke started our first business together in 2004 and since then we’ve launched and sold (and lost) several side projects/businesses. So we’ve been through the highs and the lows and what we’ve discovered is that we’re quite different in some ways: we have different appetites towards risk, we have different strengths and weaknesses and we often have differences of opinion, too. But we do all share two things: values and aspirations.

That means that we don’t spend a lot of time debating whether something is right or wrong, but more whether it gets us to where we want to be as efficiently as possible. It also means that if we disagree with each other, we know it’s not personal… we all want the same thing after all.

So my tips would be:

  • try and establish that you have shared values early on. If you aren’t aligned here: if one person thinks creating a great working culture is important and another thinks that it’s a waste of time and money, then you are going to spend too much time debating that every time it comes up

  • find consensus, even if that’s a compromise, then execute that plan. Don’t look back: decide on something as a group then just do it, even if you weren’t 100% in agreement.

  • talk all the time. If you are frustrated or worried, talk to your co-founders. Don’t let it linger and fester.

  • don’t make it all about work and understand that people have lives outside of work. We’re all human beings trying to do our best and we all have flaws.

  • then finally, play to your strengths and accept your weaknesses. In our business, I love metrics but I’m not as technical as I’d like to be. Mark hates numbers but is good at understanding the technical complexities. Luke is CTO so obviously gets the technology but traditionally hasn’t had much to do with sales and customers. We can’t all be good at everything.


Thank you David for taking the time to answer this - totally makes sense. Having that money will help when things don’t go as planned(mostly that’s the case with a startup :frowning: )


Hi Kevin

One of my favorite topics!

  1. I’d say the main things you need to be watching are: MRR Growth, Customer Acquisition Costs and Churn.

MRR Growth, because at that stage, you need to be showing growth at speed if you want to raise more money. Remember that the ideal growth trajectory post $1m is T2:D3 (ie Triple, Triple, Double, Double, Double for each year after $1m). So you need to be coming into that first year post $1m quite hard. For us, it took us about 22 months to get to $1m, and then 6 months more to get to $2m. Sometimes it’s hard, but anything you can do to improve growth is good - well almost anything:

CAC - customer acquisition cost. One of our side projects (we were a minority shareholder) was dead before it even got going really. In spite getting to $3m+ in revenues, it was on the back of acquisition costs that were higher even than its Lifetime Value. So, no matter how fast your growth, if it costs more to acquire a customer than you will ever get back from them then ultimately that’s unsustainable. The rule of thumb is a CAC equal to or less than the Annual Contract Value, but in the early days you should expect a much lower CAC than that. Costs get higher as you get bigger and move upstream, but early on you should be able to win customers with much less spend, relying on early adopters, word of mouth and hustle!

Then Churn - the silent killer. Again, probably less of an issue very early on, but keep an eye on it as you get bigger. The Quick SaaS Ratio ($ new + expansion) - (contraction + churn) won’t be as important early on, but will start to be something to watch as you get bigger. It needs to be at least 4. This shows that you are efficient at growing your business. If you see your churn starting to grow, hop on it and try and work out what the issue is. Sadly, churn is a bit of a lagging indicator, but you can start to see if there is a link between churn and other behaviour that may flag warning signs in the future.

  1. Organic inbound - same. We invested very heavily in content from Day 1. It was long-tail (ie about the problems we were solving) rather than about us and we committed to producing 4 bits of content every week. It took time to see the results, but today we still get a lot of leads from the content that we have been building over the last 4 years.

  2. Churn. We were quite lucky - we have always had net negative revenue churn, ie people expand by more than they churn. This is partly because your early customers are more forgiving and partly because you are adding way more than your existing customer base is churning. I think one thing we did that has stood the test of time, was being very responsive to customers big and small. It’s one of the reasons why people say they chose us over others. And when you’re small you can afford to do that - you can even have personal outreach by one of the founders to demonstrate how much you care. Today we still have net negative revenue churn, but the % is smaller and churn is an ongoing concern for us. It never disappears. The only thing I would say is that when you get bigger customers, your churn reduces significantly.


Hi Krish

This is such a question close to my heart and i could talk about it for hours, but I’ll just tell you what happened with us.

I think in total, the time from saying we were going to move full-time onto ScreenCloud and then finally concluding it was a couple of years. We’d spoken about that transition for a while, but actually making the commitment to get rid of the agency came a bit later (because we thought we could do both). For us we sold the agency and raised our seed round in the same month and I think if we hadn’t done it like that, it would have been tricky. At the same time, raising a seed round whilst also running another business wasn’t easy either. Investors were wary. So it’s a fine balancing act.

Because you can’t predict exactly how things will pan out, my advice would be to come up with a plan with your co-founder(s) and then execute that plan bit by bit. So long as you are making progress towards it, you will get there eventually. We’d decided that if we hadn’t sold the agency by the time we raised our seed round, we would just close it down. We had to have that deadline where we could all be 100% focused on our real future. As it turned out we were lucky enough to find a home for it in time.

On the staff question: most of the staff in the UK went with the agency to the new owner. They were, after all, agency people and a lot of them didn’t want to work on a single product. Our dev team, who were mainly based in Thailand (where Luke is based) were very happy not to have demanding clients any more and so they all moved over. We had enough time to hire people in London to plug any gaps left by Thailand.

In terms of incentives and salaries - everyone (apart from the founders) stayed on the same salary and we had stock options that we were able to give them. Not sure how easy it would have been to try and cut salaries for staff.


Hi Ravi

Wow - great questions.

  1. The main mindset change is that you are no longer building for individual clients, you are building what’s best for your business aspirations. When you are a consultancy you do everything your customers ask you to do (more or less). But, your main priority now shifts to the product and that product has to be solving problems for the majority of your customers (or in line with your roadmap) rather than what an individual wants. It’s quite hard when someone says “can you make it do this?” not to respond by doing what they ask. But, actually your product roadmap priorities are much more important. The danger is that you get sidetracked, or spend all of your time and money building something that only one customer cares about.
  2. By learning to say ‘no’. By explaining that you can’t do consultancy and that you are thankful for their ideas and it will be discussed at the next product planning meeting and when you have more news about whether or when it will be incorporated, you will let them know. You could also split out a separate Pro Services team, but you have to separate out recurring revenue from non-recurring project based revenue. Don’t fudge the two and focus primarily on building the recurring element!
  3. Not sure! I guess exactly as you say: if you want to scale it is impossible to ‘paper over the gaps’ with manual services. The company has a choice: do they want to stay where they are or do they want to scale. If they want to scale, you need to build a scaleable product and go to market process.

Hi Pranay

These are, I guess, the million dollar questions!

  1. In the early days I would say it’s about creating good, believable content. When we started, we didn’t write a piece about ScreenCloud and how great we were, we filmed a video explaining how to get your Tweets onto a screen using a Google Chromecast. And then we did the same thing but using an Amazon Fire TV stick. So really try and be where your customers are and write about the real problems you are solving. We also used Adwords and are on review sites such as G2 and Capterra. Unfortunately, it’s a question of plugging away and being consistent. Down the line you can start doing outbound, but that is expensive and you need to have a mature product and a very clear idea of who you are targeting.

  2. You need to decide if you think funding will make the difference between getting you to where you need to be or not. For us, we knew we wanted to move fast, we knew what we had to do and we didn’t want to boot-strap it and take longer to get things going. We also wanted to know quickly if it wasn’t going to work so we could move on. So for us investment was the right thing, but it doesn’t have to be for everyone. There are plenty of companies who never took any investment and succeeded. If you do want to go down that route, I would start as soon as you are confident that you have something that could be successful but feel you are being held back too much because of funds. Make sure you don’t give away too much in equity and ideally look for enough money to take you to your next milestone.

Good luck!


I love this response, thanks so much David. And congrats on building such a phenomenal business. You all rock and are heroes in my eyes.


Hey Teren

I do have children, but I have been careful not to make sacrifices that I think have negatively impacted my personal life. At times I’ve earnt less money, sure and I have worked hard and been really stressed, but not to the point where my kids never see their Dad or we can’t eat! So I think there has to be a balance. Mark, my co-founder, has spoken openly about some of the mental health challenges he has faced running a business and how teaching exercise classes saved him. I honestly believe that unless you take care of your health (mental and physical) and make sure you are there for the people you love, then no amount of commercial success is worth it.

One advantage of being your own boss is that you get to decide how you spend your time and I would say you should fiercely protect that. Do the things that keep you sane and happy, and don’t feel guilty that, for example, going to the gym in the afternoon is what you need to do to get the best out of your day. In fact, once you embrace that, it makes being an entrepreneur much less of a ‘sacrifice’ than, say, putting up with a horrible boss!